The Fathers Rights Network

The Fathers Rights Network remains a Free Resource, however we do ask that you visit one of the sites above to help our Sponsor defray the costs to host our service. --> The Fathers Rights Network advocates the Rights for Children to have access to

**[1] Calculation of Support Under the Melson Formula Model**

The Melson formula was named after Judge Elwood F. Melson of the Delaware Family Court and was fully explained and adopted in *Dalton v. Clanton*.^{70 }
The formula, a more complicated version of the income shares model,
reflects several public policy judgments. First, the Melson Formula
explicitly recognizes that support of others is impossible until one's
own basic support needs are met. Second, the Melson Formula model
reflects the public policy that further enhancement of the parents' own
economic status should not be allowed until the parents jointly, in
proportion to their incomes, meet the basic poverty level needs of
their children. Finally, the Melson Formula model, by incorporating a
Standard of Living Adjustment (SOLA), reflects the policy judgment that
parents should share their additional incomes with their children,
improving their children's standard of living as their own standard of
living improves.

The formula allocates to each parent a poverty self-support reserve. The formula then determines the total remaining combined parental income, the noncustodial parent's percentage thereof, and applies the noncustodial parent's percentage to a standard "primary support obligation" based on the number of children. Finally, after the primary support obligation is subtracted, the formula assesses the noncustodial parent an additional percentage of his or her remaining income.

The Melson Formula model is thus basically a six step process:

1. Provide for each parent's minimal self-support needs.

2. Provide for the children's primary support needs.

3. Determine work-related child care expenses and extraordinary medical expenses.

4. Determine the Standard of Living Allowance.

5. Add together the amounts determined in steps 2, 3, and 4.

6. Allocate the support between the parents according to each parent's percentage of total net income.

For example, suppose child support must be determined for one child whose custodial parent has a gross income of $1,000 per month and whose noncustodial parent has a gross income of $2,000 per month. Child care expenses are $50 per month, and extraordinary medical expenses are $15 per month. (For ease in calculation, assume that health insurance is paid by the father's employer, and there are no pre-existing support orders for child support or alimony.)

Using the Delaware ^{71 } child support guidelines, the calculation of child support would be as follows:

(1) First, subtract federal and state taxes, and subtract a self-support reserve of $550 for each parent to yield a "net" income of $950 for the noncustodial parent, and $230 for the custodial parent.

(2) Second, add the two net incomes of the parents to reach a combined net available income of $1180. Thus, the custodial parent's proportional obligation is 80%, or $950 = $1180.

(3) Third, the basic support obligation is determined. Using the chart provided, it is $220 for one child.

(4) Fourth, added to the $220 is child care expenses of $50 per month, to yield a primary support obligation of $270.

(5) Fifth, determine the amount of SOLA available. The SOLA amount is the amount determined in (2), $1180, minus the amount determined in (4), $270. The available SOLA is $910. The SOLA percentage, as determined from the chart provided, is 18%; thus, the SOLA is $163.80.

(6) Sixth, add together the primary support obligation, $270, plus the SOLA obligation, $163.80. The total support obligation is thus $433.80.

(7) Finally, multiply the total support obligation by the appropriate noncustodial parent percentage to yield the noncustodial parent's obligation. In this case, it is $347.04.

**[2] Strengths and Weaknesses of the Melson Formula Model**

The proponents of the Melson Formula model argue its internal logic makes it the fairest of the models.^{72 }
Even though the Melson Formula model seems to be the most complicated
of the models, its proponents contend that its seeming complexity is
superficial; once a practitioner has used the Melson Formula model, its
subsequent application is simple.^{73 }

The Melson Formula model is, indeed, the most internally consistent. It takes into consideration not only special custody
arrangements and health care needs, it also takes into consideration each *parent's* needs. It is thus, on its face, the fairest as perceived by the parent. Where perceived
fairness is the most important factor, then the Melson Formula model is
the clear winner. Moreover, one expert has found that the Melson
Formula model tends to produce less extreme differences in living
standards where one parent has a very low income and the other parent
has significantly higher income.^{74 }
This again contributes to the perceived fairness of the Melson Formula
model. Moreover, because the Melson Formula model takes into
consideration commonly occurring expenses, it is consistent and
predictable. Its only fault is in its facial complexity.

^{70 } 559 A.2d 1197 (Del. 1989). (back)

^{71 } Del. Child Support Formula, Civ. R. 52(c). (back)

^{72 } R. Williams, "An Overview of Child Support Guidelines," *Child Support Guidelines: The Next Generation*, at 7 (U.S. Dep't of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 1994). (back)

^{73 } As stated by one author, the perception of comparative complexity of the Melson Formula model may be due more to lack of
familiarity than to fact, and may be outweighed by other factors. M. Takas, *Improving Child Support Guidelines: Can Simple Formulas Address Complex Families?*, 26 Fam. L. Q. 171 (1992). (back)

^{74 } N. Erickson, *Child Support Guidelines: A Primer*, 26 Clearinghouse Rev. 734, 739 (1993), citing letter from M. Takas. (back)

Keywords: - child formula melson method support